data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d137a/d137aa1d70f6a436377e339c3f5c51f7a66395a3" alt="" |
Evidence for the Structure of Atoms
How do we know what the structure of atoms is like?
Our current picture of the atom wasn't created all at once; it was built up
and improved step by step based on experimental evidence and some extremely
clever insights.
Some ancient Greek philosophers speculated that everything might be made of
little chunks they called "atoms." The name comes from a Greek word
meaning "uncuttable"; atoms were supposed to be unbreakable, the smallest
possible units of anything.
In later centuries, scientists more or less left the atom idea on the shelf,
until the early nineteenth century, when the chemist John
Dalton came out with an updated atomic theory of his own.
|
|
This is the same John Dalton I mentioned in our discussion of atomic weight. As I said then, he and
others had noticed that elements in chemical reactions combine in certain
definite proportions; this, Dalton guessed, had to mean that the elements
were made of tiny, unbreakable chunks that always stick together in the same
ways--two hydrogen chunks plus an oxygen chunk always makes water, for
example.
So Dalton's guess was right.
It was, and it wasn't.
The scientific world soon accepted that atoms did exist...but were they really
unbreakable?
Meanwhile, a lot of apparently unrelated experiments about electricity had
been going on. By the nineteenth century, scientists knew a fair
amount about how electricity behaved--but what was it, exactly? Some
kind of fluid? Waves? A bunch of little particles?
|
|
In 1897, J. J. Thomson answered this question. He
found that cathode rays were bent in certain
directions by electric and magnetic fields, and therefore, he thought, must
be made up of negatively charged particles of some sort. Later, those
particles were named electrons.
To find out more about Thomson and his experiments, you can take a look at
the following links:
|